Extension of term Limits: A distraction or a strategic power grab?

As debate swirls around the proposal to extend term limits, many wonder if this move is merely a distraction from pressing national issues or a calculated bid for prolonged power. Critics and political analysts warn that relaxing term limits could encourage a concentration of power, leaving little room for new voices and ideas. This perspective raises an important question: is this proposal truly about enhancing governance, or does it signify a shift toward entrenching power at the top?

The recent push by some Kenyan lawmakers to extend term limits from five to seven years for elected officials, including the President, has sparked widespread public backlash. This proposal, spearheaded by Senator Samson Cherargei's Constitution of Kenya (Amendment) Bill, 2024, has been met with skepticism and condemnation from various quarters, including citizens, political analysts, and even members of the ruling United Democratic Alliance (UDA) party.

The timing of this proposed amendment has raised eyebrows, particularly as Kenya grapples with pressing economic challenges such as high inflation, unemployment, and ongoing strikes by public service providers. Critics argue that this move is a deliberate attempt to divert attention from these critical issues and consolidate power within the political elite. The Daily Nation editorial aptly described the proposal as "vexatious," highlighting its potential to strain public finances and destabilize governance by centralizing authority.

Historically, Kenya's 2010 Constitution has emphasized checks and balances, including a two-term, five-year limit for the presidency. Extending this limit would not only impact the presidency but also affect local governance by lengthening the terms of governors and other officials. This raises concerns about hindering citizens' ability to hold their leaders accountable. Political commentator Martin Andati has suggested that the Bill might be a calculated move to shift public focus away from the current administration's shortcomings.

The legal path for the bill to pass is strenuous, requiring a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament and subsequent ratification through a national referendum. This process is both costly and time-consuming, particularly during a period when resources could be better allocated to pressing social issues like education and healthcare. 

Many Kenyans continue to struggle with exorbitant healthcare costs, even with the implementation of the Social Health Authority (SHA). The intended subsidies have proven inadequate, particularly for those in the informal sector who lack stable incomes. As such, it begs the question: Shouldn't the government prioritize addressing these pressing healthcare challenges before contemplating the extension of term limits?

Similarly, students joining universities and tertiary institutions are facing significant financial challenges due to the recent hike in university fees under the new "funding model." Our MPs seem to have forgotten their primary duty, which is to represent and serve the interests of the people. They have neglected crucial human-interest issues and instead focused on the executive's agenda, betraying the trust placed in them by the electorate.

The proposed extension of term limits has also been met with strong public opposition, mirroring the reaction to the Finance Bill 2024. Kenyans have mobilized to voice their concerns, as evidenced by the recent "crash" of the Senate's email system due to the overwhelming number of emails from citizens expressing their disapproval. It is imperative that our elected officials heed the concerns of the people and prioritize their needs over personal political ambitions.

Legal experts, including former presidential candidate Ekuru Aukot, remain skeptical about the Bill's viability, predicting that public opposition could derail its success in a referendum.

In conclusion, the proposal to extend term limits has been widely criticized for prioritizing political interests over public welfare. Whether viewed as a distraction or a strategic power grab, the Bill faces significant opposition from the public and legal experts alike. It is unlikely to gain traction without a transparent, justified, and democratic process that addresses the genuine concerns of the Kenyan people. 

Posted by Loise Mwakamba on Oct. 25, 2024

Categories:  parliament   democracy   Accountability   Checks and Balances   Term Extension