On Constitution Implementation

Despite the enactment of several bills provided for in the constitution, the ongoing establishment of constitutional commissions, the continuing reforms of various arms of government and the recent resolution of the public spat between the Attorney General and the Commission for the Implementation of the Constitution on implementation, embracing a sense of all is well and back on track with the implementation of the constitution would be hasty.

Following the one year anniversary of its establishement the Commission for the Implementation of the Constitution has published on it’s website an article on status of the implementation of the constitution. The status update on the implementation process covers the implementation process, citizen participation, amendments to the Constitution, and the transition to devolved government. The update highlights several red flags and makes some rather worrying revelations about the implementation process, for instance:

  • Most of the bills developed have not been based on policies and the laws passed have not been reinforced by administrative procedures.
  • Some provisions in the enacted legislation either violate the letter of the constitution or are in conflict with the reformist spirit of the Constitution.
  • Certain legislation e.g. Contingencies Fund and County Emergency Funds Act, 2011 and the National Government Loans Guarantee Act, 2011, were enacted in direct violation of the due process laid out in Article 261 (4) and Section 5 (6)(b) of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution. Lack of compliance with process for enactment of legislation calls into question the validity of these laws.
  • Inadequacy in the provisions of some legislation despite advisories issued by Commission for the Implementation of the Constitution to the various implementing partners.
  • The passage into law of certain legislation including some Private Member Bills, which have neither followed the constitutional procedure nor had public participation and yet they affect the implementation of the Constitution.

With the continual sidelining of the Commission for the Implementation of the Constitution over the last year some would argue that these gaps in implementation are unsurprising. However now that the spat between the Attorney General and the Commission for Implementation of the Commission has been resolved hopefully the two will work collaboratively as envisioned the constitution to work out the substantive implementation issues.

Full article “Status of the Implementation of the Constitution, on Year After the Establishement of the CIC”.

Posted by Mzalendo Editor on Jan. 12, 2012

Categories:  No tags

0 COMMENTS

POST YOUR COMMENT

You must login to comment


There are no comments.